VAR will not solve football’s old problems

VAR will not solve football’s old problems

Last update: 19 June 2019 Categories: Uncategorized.


In theory, VAR is a system which every fan wants; a way of helping match-officials overturn obvious errors they might have missed.





Although, VAR
in its current state is far from ideal.





Decisions are more controversial than ever and VAR has been creating its own problems The debate over controversial decisions will not end with the current use of VAR.





VAR controlling officiating





VAR is
inadvertently controlling how football matches are being refereed.





Linesman
are keeping their flags down for offside decisions and referees are falling
back on VAR to make decisions for them, especially for infractions in the
penalty area.





These infractions
called by referees through VAR are soft and oblivious to any fan watching in
the stands.





Handballs in the penalty area are being given when the ball hits a player’s hand from less than 3-yards. Australia’s penalty against Denmark in the 2018 World Cup Group Stage is a classic example.





The rules
around handball are being changed for the 2019/2020 Premier League
season, but other soft infringements in the penalty area are still being given.





Diving is
still an epidemic.  





The
practice is being encouraged by managers, with forwards and defenders falling
over to try and force the referee to make a decision or go to VAR for a chance
at a penalty or to reverse a goal.





Gianluca Scamacca’s disallowed goal in the U20 World Cup Semi-Final
between Italy and Ukraine is a heinous example of VAR intrusiveness.






https://twitter.com/FreeSports_TV/status/1138500318327640064




The
injury-time winner was disallowed due to an apparent elbow on Ukraine defender Valerii
Bondar.





Bondar went down under soft contact and the goal was still wrongfully overturned. For me, the apparent elbow was not “clear and obvious.”





Clear and Obvious – a subjective term expecting
objective results





The term
“clear and obvious” is used as a common sense measure for the VAR to review a
decision with the referee.





On paper,
the term is useful and allows the game to flow without VAR constantly being
used. Despite these good intentions, the term has caused constant problems.





Gareth
Southgate spoke about the term last-year, when England drew 1-1 with Italy in a World Cup warm-up match in
controversial fashion. 





"I don't think with incidents like that
VAR will clear things up."





"For me, the two things [about VAR] are
whether it is 'clear and obvious' and to have a better way of communicating
what has happened and why for the spectators in the stadium."





Southgate
is right in his assessment. VAR over-turned and undermined the original from
the referee, which was not a clear mistake.





Undermining
the on-field referee in this manner will lead to more gamesmanship from players.
 





Crowding
around the referee and linesman to try and influence whether VAR should be used
will become commonplace.





Even with
the “clear and obvious” caveat, the examples covered already are anything but.





VAR is leading to soft play and gamesmanship on the pitch whilst taking the positive emotions off it.









Can we celebrate a goal now?





With the
prospect of VAR being overused, the spontaneous outburst of emotion from
celebrating a goal will be taken away.





Callum
Wilson highlighted this problem in an interview with Sky Sports.





Wilson
pointed out that soft goals being reversed after a long period of review is anti-climactic
for players and supports.





The delays
for offside goals are long and if certain stadiums do not have video replay
facilities, supporters in the stadium are left none the wiser.





It will be
unsurprising if players refrain from celebrating goals due to VAR going beyond
the “clear and obvious “definition and allowing soft decisions on the pitch.





For me, VAR’s teething problems are unsurprising, I have seen them already in other sports.





I Have Seen These Problems Before









In ice
hockey, VAR has been used for a number of years and it is still not solving
contentious in-games decisions.





Both ice
hockey and football are fast-paced team sports, where officials can easily miss
fouls or infractions which can disallow a goal.





Similar to
soft fouls in football, goaltender interference in ice hockey has led to
inconsistent refereeing decisions being made.





Goaltender
interference is used to disallow a goal if the goaltender is stopped for making
a save.





Even with
the use of VAR, the calls for goaltender interference are inconsistent and are
ruining the fan experience at the match.





Ice hockey
fans have no idea how goaltender interference will be decided and hockey fans are
frustrated, in a similar way that football fans don’t know how contact in the
penalty area will be called.





In most games, Scamacca’s goal for Italy U20's would stand.





VAR will
not end controversy in football as advertised in the media. If used properly,
the system can help referees but as supporters have seen already seen, the
system is becoming intrusive and is having too much of a negative impact on
football.





Already during the Women’s World Cup and the Nations League, VAR has dominated the headlines due to controversial decisions, which is against the very intention of the system. It is “clear and obvious” to football fans that FIFA needs a rethink when it comes to the use of VAR.





What are your thoughts on this? Let us know in the comments below!